Amazon Web Services vs Microsoft Azure
2026 comparison on prices, plans, regions and editorial verdict.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Amazon Web Services | Microsoft Azure |
|---|---|---|
| From | $3.5/mes | $7.59/mes |
| Plans | 4 | 3 |
| Regions | 20 | 19 |
| HQ | Seattle, EEUU | Redmond, EEUU |
| Categories | VPSVDSDedicated serverS3 storageManaged hostingCDN | VPSVDSS3 storageManaged hostingCDN |
| Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.3/5 |
Amazon Web Services
The enterprise default. Unrivalled for flexibility and global network, but the bill surprises almost everyone.
Pros
- 33+ regions
- Spot instances 70-90% off
- Advanced managed services
- IAM granular
Cons
- Expensive egress fees ($0.09/GB)
- Complex per-component pricing
- Premium support billed separately
- Steep learning curve
Microsoft Azure
Best fit if you already pay Microsoft. For pure Linux there are cheaper options.
Pros
- 60+ regions
- Hybrid Benefit lowers Windows cost
- Compliance certifications
Cons
- Complex pricing (similar to AWS)
- Expensive egress
- Portal UI sometimes slow
Category overlap
Both offer
VPSVDSS3 storageManaged hostingCDN
Only Amazon Web Services
Dedicated server
Only Microsoft Azure
Frequently asked questions
Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure: which is cheaper?
Amazon Web Services from $3.5/mo vs Microsoft Azure from $7.59/mo. Amazon Web Services is cheaper on its entry plan.
Which provider has better region coverage?
Amazon Web Services offers 20 regions. Microsoft Azure offers 19 regions.
Which has the better editorial rating?
Amazon Web Services: 4.4/5 · Microsoft Azure: 4.3/5.