Amazon Web Services vs Cloudflare
2026 comparison on prices, plans, regions and editorial verdict.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Amazon Web Services | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|
| From | $3.5/mes | $0/mes |
| Plans | 4 | 4 |
| Regions | 20 | 1 |
| HQ | Seattle, EEUU | San Francisco, EEUU |
| Categories | VPSVDSDedicated serverS3 storageManaged hostingCDN | Edge / WorkersS3 storageCDN |
| Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.7/5 |
Amazon Web Services
The enterprise default. Unrivalled for flexibility and global network, but the bill surprises almost everyone.
Pros
- 33+ regions
- Spot instances 70-90% off
- Advanced managed services
- IAM granular
Cons
- Expensive egress fees ($0.09/GB)
- Complex per-component pricing
- Premium support billed separately
- Steep learning curve
Cloudflare
The best option for edge functions and S3 storage with no egress billing surprises. Workers competes with Vercel/Netlify at a fraction of the price.
Pros
- R2 = zero egress fees (vs $0.09/GB on AWS S3)
- Workers free tier 100k req/day
- Workers cold start ~5ms (V8 isolates)
- CDN included in everything
- Free unlimited DDoS protection
Cons
- Workers only supports JavaScript/WASM (no arbitrary containers)
- CPU time limits per request on the free plan
- Some features tied to Cloudflare DNS
Category overlap
Both offer
S3 storageCDN
Only Amazon Web Services
VPSVDSDedicated serverManaged hosting
Only Cloudflare
Edge / Workers
Frequently asked questions
Amazon Web Services or Cloudflare: which is cheaper?
Amazon Web Services from $3.5/mo vs Cloudflare from $0/mo. Cloudflare is cheaper on its entry plan.
Which provider has better region coverage?
Amazon Web Services offers 20 regions. Cloudflare offers 1 regions.
Which has the better editorial rating?
Amazon Web Services: 4.4/5 · Cloudflare: 4.7/5.