Cloudflare vs Wasabi
2026 comparison on prices, plans, regions and editorial verdict.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Cloudflare | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| From | $0/mes | — |
| Plans | 4 | 1 |
| Regions | 1 | 10 |
| HQ | San Francisco, EEUU | Boston, EEUU |
| Categories | Edge / WorkersS3 storageCDN | S3 storage |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.4/5 |
Cloudflare
The best option for edge functions and S3 storage with no egress billing surprises. Workers competes with Vercel/Netlify at a fraction of the price.
Pros
- R2 = zero egress fees (vs $0.09/GB on AWS S3)
- Workers free tier 100k req/day
- Workers cold start ~5ms (V8 isolates)
- CDN included in everything
- Free unlimited DDoS protection
Cons
- Workers only supports JavaScript/WASM (no arbitrary containers)
- CPU time limits per request on the free plan
- Some features tied to Cloudflare DNS
Wasabi
Flat storage with no surprises. You lose tier flexibility (no cheaper archive).
Pros
- Zero egress
- Zero API fees
- Predictable flat pricing
Cons
- 90-day minimum billable retention
- Fair-use egress of 1× stored data
Category overlap
Both offer
S3 storage
Only Cloudflare
Edge / WorkersCDN
Only Wasabi
Frequently asked questions
Cloudflare or Wasabi: which is cheaper?
They have different pricing models. Check the specific plans for your use case.
Which provider has better region coverage?
Cloudflare offers 1 regions. Wasabi offers 10 regions.
Which has the better editorial rating?
Cloudflare: 4.7/5 · Wasabi: 4.4/5.
